Aringo helps MBA candidates prepare outstanding applications (essays, resume/CV, recommendations) for the world's top MBA programs.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Columbia and Berkeley Publish 2014 Deadlines


Columbia and Berkeley published deadlines for their MBA programs beginning in 2014.

Columbia:
January 2014- 10/2/13
Early Decision- August 2014- 10/2/13
Regular Decision- August 2014- 4/9/14

Berkeley:
Round 1- 10/16/13
Round 2- 1/8/14
Round 3- 3/12/14


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

2014 Deadlines Released for INSEAD and Michigan


INSEAD and Michigan published deadlines for their 2014 MBA programs:

INSEAD September 2014:
Round 1 - 10/2/13
Round 2 – 11/27/13
Round 3 – 5/3/13

Michigan:
Round 1 – 1/10/13
Round 2 – 2/1/14
Round 3 – 3/3/14


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Crossing Fingers!

Another Aringo client was invited to interview at ESADE (MBA) and IE (MBA).

Saturday, May 04, 2013

Harvard and Stanford Publish 2014 Deadlines


Harvard and Stanford have published their 2014 deadlines early this year:

Harvard only published its Round 1 deadline: September 16, 2013

Stanford published deadlines for all three rounds:
Round 1- October 2, 2013
Round 2- August 1, 2013
Round 3- February 4, 2014

Plan accordingly!


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

INSEAD Tops New European MBA Ranking


The site Poets & Quants reports on a new ranking of the top 20 European MBA programs. The ranking, recently published by Businessweek, is based solely on a survey among international corporate recruiters conducted by the company QS Quacquarelli Symonds. LBS followed in second and IMD ranked third.

The survey is particularly interesting due to the large amount of self-reported data gathered from the different schools. In terms of size, the biggest European program is INSEAD with 1,008 students, followed by IE with 450 students, and LBS with 406. The remaining European programs are relatively small, with over half of the 20 programs numbering less than 100 MBA students.

The survey also publicized the average GMAT scores of students at the different European programs, with INSEAD again leading with an average score of 703 (a number comparable with the mean score at Michigan and Darden, but far lower than at the top U.S. programs). LBS followed with a mean score of 698 and HEC Paris took third with 690.

In terms of starting salaries among graduates, IMD ranked first with an average starting salary of $132,852, with Warwick in the second spot with $129,970. In this area, the European programs actually dominate when compared with the top U.S. programs (last year Stanford recorded $129,652 and Harvard $124,085). The average starting salary for INSEAD graduates is $102,888, while LBS salaries average $110,606.

The most expensive MBA program in Europe is HEC Paris with tuition at $103,860, with IESE in second with tuition at $88,692. LBS follows in third with tuition at $87,164.


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Duke Intensifies its Efforts Against Plagiarism


A Businessweek article reports that Fuqua Business School at Duke University will begin to use a plagiarism detection program in checking MBA applicants’ essays. In the last application season, the school conducted a pilot use of the program, and even rejected a candidate caught for stealing content.

Liz Riley, Admissions Director at Duke, stated that the school used a large number of applications as samples in order to learn how to use the program ahead of its full employment the following season. The need for such a program arose after the school was notified that a number of candidates submitted essays written by others. While it is obviously impossible to catch every single one, the schools hopes it is at least a step in the right direction.

The Anderson School at UCLA has been using a plagiarism detection program since the 2011-12 season and has since rejected 115 candidates based on its findings. Other schools do not make public whether they use the program, but among those that do are Penn State’s Smeal College of Business, Wake Forest University, and Northeastern University.


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Thursday, April 18, 2013

How Do I Get Off the Waitlist?


A few months ago, we posted Aringo’s tips for those waitlisted, a situation familiar to many MBA candidates at this point in the year. For those left with a taste for more (or left on the waiting list), here are some additional tips from the site Poets & Quants towards acceptance from the waiting list.

"UNDERSTAND YOUR WAITLIST STATUS
There are two kinds of waitlists. The opt-out waitlist means that a school automatically puts you on its waitlist unless you tell them to remove you. The opt-in waitlist requires that you accept a position on the list, usually within a certain time frame. Always accept a waitlist offer, even if you’re not sure what you want to do. You can always withdraw later.
IMMEDIATELY ASK FOR AN APPLICATION REVIEW
Some MBA programs, like Cornell’s Johnson School, will give you feedback as to why you were waitlisted. They may even make specific suggestions for how you can improve your chances of getting off the waitlist and into the incoming class. (I have known Columbia to ask people to raise their GMAT thirty points, for example, for automatic entry.) If your school offers reviews, the waitlist letter will say so. If it specifically tells you not to contact them, don’t ask. If the school is unclear, or if you get an obviously personalized waitlist notification from a specific individual, feel free to ask for feedback.
WRITE AN UPDATE LETTER
You only write a single update letter—they don’t need to be notified every time your boss says “good job.” Submit your letter via email three to four weeks after getting waitlisted. If you were waitlisted as a first-round applicant, send your update letter in about four weeks before the second-round decision-announcement date, as many waitlisted first-round candidates are actively considered as second round candidates as well.
GET A NEW RECOMMENDATION
Unless the school specifically asks that you do not send in a new recommendation, you’ll want to take this step. If you applied to a school that requires three recs, like Harvard and Stanford, you’ve already got a third rec “in the can” you could use for any school that originally required only two recs.
GET LETTERS OF SUPPORT
Now is when letters of support are most effective—an additional voice to weigh in now that the school has already judged you worthy.
TAKE CLASSES
If your GPA is low, that probably factored heavily into why you weren’t a clear admit. Immediately sign up for a couple of community college classes at night—and get As—to prove you’ve got the intellectual ability as well as the discipline to do well in a rigorous quantitative curriculum. The four best classes to choose from are any kind of accounting, microeconomics, calculus, or statistics.
RETAKE THE GMAT 
Let them know your plans in your update letter— including the date you intend to take the test—and send them the result in a “ping” email. If you’ve already got a 700-plus GMAT, or at least an 80 percentile quant score, raising your score further won’t likely help. If you were waitlisted with less than a 680 GMAT, raising it to at least 680 may dramatically increase your chances of getting off the waitlist. If you were waitlisted at a very competitive school with less than a 680 GMAT, chances are the school really liked you—they simply have concerns about your score. Raising that score removes the most likely reason you were waitlisted rather than accepted outright.
VISIT THE CAMPUS AND VISIT AGAIN 
No matter why you’ve been waitlisted, you should get yourself to campus ASAP. Ask to see an admissions officer; include this request in your update letter. Many schools will be happy to accommodate you; for the ones that won’t, camp out in the admissions office and ambush someone. Seriously—that has worked for many of our candidates in the past! Tell them you were in town on business and you simply wanted to put a face to the name. Don’t spend more than five minutes with an admission officer unless they invite you to stay longer.
PING THE COMMITTEE
Your first contact will be your update letter, and you’ll continue to ping the committee after that with a brief note. Send a brief note to your waitlist manager (if you were assigned one) or to the director of admissions expressing your continued interest in the school, willingness to provide further information, or anything else you feel is appropriate. “Ping” emails should go out about once every three weeks. When decision time comes, it is your name they will remember."

After you’ve done everything in your abilities to gain acceptance, here is some general advice offered by Chicago’s admissions committee:

"What’s done is done
Take the long view, and stay focused on the future without looking back. You finally hit submit, worked hard to get there, and have already done what you can to put your best foot forward. So don’t dwell on what you could have done better, how you should have included that alternate essay, second guess other offers you may have rejected, or agonize over getting into ‘the one’. At this stage, it’s important to keep your eyes on what matters most - choosing a school where you will  have a great experience (even if it wasn’t your first choice) and jump-start your future career. The results may be out of your hands at the moment, but you can still continue to map out your goals. Keep thinking about what you want your career and life to look like, not just for the next two years, but for the next ten years and beyond.

Take care of business
This will require you to think positively. Imagine you are starting business school in the fall. Are you headed to a different city or country in just a few months? Start thinking about how you will break the news to your employer and what strategies you will employ to do that gracefully. You may wish to begin researching the cities where your top business schools are located; what’s the cost of living? Do they offer serviceable public transportation? Since this will mean a major life change with many associated costs, this is also a fine time to start putting away funds for those expenses. Most importantly, analyze what you need to take care of at home before your transition begins.

Cultivate your network
You’ve probably met a lot of people while on this MBA journey and that’s a good thing. No matter where you and your new acquaintances end up, this is the start of a network filled with like-minded people. Having access to people you met in the MBA search process will yield great friends, partners to exchange ideas with, or potential business colleagues for your entire career."



Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Congratulations!

Another Aringo client got accepted to UCLA (MBA).

Monday, April 15, 2013

Crossing Fingers!

Another Aringo client was invited to interview at INSEAD (MBA).

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Update from Harvard for Round 3 Applicants


HBS posted an update on its blog for Round 3 applicants:

"On Monday, April 22, probably at noon Boston time, every Round 3 applicant will get an email from us. You'll receive either an invitation to interview or a "Sorry, we can't offer you a place in the class" notification.

Interviews will be conducted on campus on May 2, 3 and 6. Those interviewing on campus will have an opportunity to do tours, have lunch, and meet with students. We will have limited spots available in Palo Alto on May 1 and 3. Candidates with real logistical challenges will be offered Skype interviews."

In an earlier post, HBS stated that they will not accept GMAT or GRE scores submitted after the deadline, but recommendations will still be accepted. Harvard confirmed that there are spots available in the class and they will accept Round 3 applicants.



Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Congratulations!

Another Aringo client got accepted to HEC (MBA).

Thursday, April 04, 2013

Congratulations!

Two additional Aringo clients got accepted to MIT (MBA).
Another Aringo client got accepted to UCLA (MBA).

Wednesday, April 03, 2013

Congratulations!

Another Aringo client was accepted to Kellogg (MBA).

Michigan Will Also Use Team-Based Interviews in 2014


A recent Businessweek article reveals that the Ross School at the University of Michigan plans to conduct team-based interviews as part of the acceptance process for its MBA program beginning in 2014. The new interviews will include a number of candidates and will allow the admissions committee to witness how candidates communicate. Ross will be the second school to incorporate this element into its acceptance process, joining Wharton.

The school has already conducted trials of team-based interview and now faces the difficulty in planning these interviews ahead of the coming season, including finding a joint time and place for the purpose of conducting the interview. For the trial stage, some candidates who came for personal interviews were asked to participate in a group interview, with the assurance that it would not affect their candidacy. About 110 applicants participated in team-based interviews run by alumni and second-year students.

The team-based interviews will entail candidates sitting around a table in groups of 4-6 with at least one interviewer. They will be initially given two random words and ten minutes to prepare a presentation that somehow connects the two words. Afterwards, each group will receive a sequence of random words and 20 minutes to prepare a group presentation that will employ these words in relating to a problem and relevant solution.

The admissions committee at Ross has explained that the team-based interview enables them to get a greater picture of the candidate and to see how he or she will function in the classroom and school community. These interviews are preferable in their opinion to personal interviews to which candidates prepare ahead of time answering questions they found on the internet. In a team-based interview, applicants must cope with a situation to which they could not have prepared ahead of time and improvise while interacting with others.
The nature of the team-based interview at Michigan is slightly different than that at Wharton. At Wharton, candidates are divided into groups of up to six and given 35 minutes to prepare and present their conclusions and recommendations for a question they had received in advance.


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Thursday, March 21, 2013

US News Specialized Rankings


Last week, in addition to its ranking of the top American MBA programs, US News also published rankings along different specialization categories:

Accounting
1- Texas
2- Wharton
3- University of Illinois
4- Chicago Booth
5- Michigan Ross

Entrepreneurship
1- Babson
2- Stanford
3- MIT Sloan
4-5- Harvard, Wharton

Finance
1- Wharton
2- Chicago Booth
3- NYU Stern
4-5- Columbia, Stanford

Information Systems
1- MIT Sloan
2- CMU Tepper
3- Texas
4-5- Arizona Eller, Minnesota Carlson

International Management
1- Thunderbird
2- Wharton
3- South Carolina Moore
4- Michigan Ross
5- NYU Stern

General Management
1- Harvard
2- Stanford
3- Wharton
4- Darden
5- Kellogg

Marketing
1- Kellogg
2- Wharton
3- Stanford
4- Duke Fuqua
5- Harvard

Nonprofit
1- Yale
2- Stanford
3- Harvard
4- Berkeley Haas
5- Kellogg


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Monday, March 18, 2013

Congratulations!

Two additional Aringo clients got accepted to Duke (MBA).

Another Aringo client was invited to interview at Berkeley (MBA).

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Harvard and Stanford Top US News Ranking Again


US News published its 2013 ranking of the top U.S. MBA programs. Like last year, Harvard and Stanford share the top spot with a perfect score of 100 out of 100. In the third spot is Wharton with a score of 99, with MIT and Kellogg sharing the fourth and fifth spots with 97. Compared with last year, the top ten remain almost exactly the same, with only Yale dropping a few spots to vacate the tenth spot for NYU.

As part of the ranking, 448 programs were surveyed between the end of 2012 and the beginning of 2013, with only 140 programs providing enough information for score calculation and ranking. Each program was awarded a weighted scoring based on criteria such as estimated quality at 40% (this finding included estimations by other schools as well as employers), alumni employment data at 35% (this finding included average starting salary and bonus, and employment rates) and the program’s acceptance selectivity at 25% (this finding included average GMAT and GRE scores of students, GPA’s, and acceptance rates).

The rest of the ranking’s leaders:

6- Chicago
7- Berkeley
8- Columbia
9- Tuck
10- NYU
11- Duke
12- Darden
13- Yale
14-15 UCLA, Michigan
16- Cornell
17- Texas
18- Emory
19- Carnegie Mellon
20- UNC

Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year) 

Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Monday, March 11, 2013

First Comes First, Even For Wharton Interviews!


A new Wharton study reveals that MBA candidates do not only compete with the thousands of candidates who applied to the same program in the same round, but mainly against the other candidates who interviewed on the same day. Interviewers tend to evaluate candidates in reference to the other candidates they interviewed that same day, and not necessarily in comparison with candidates they interviewed over a longer period of time. It seems that candidates who interview towards the end of the day have a lower chance of being accepted!

This is especially true for a strong candidate who interviews after a sequence of strong candidates. The interviewer will usually refrain from granting a number of good scores in a row, and therefore is likely to evaluate the next candidate lower. Of course, a strong candidate after a sequence of weaker candidates will actually be at an advantage. In addition, if the interviewer knows that in general he should recommend about 50% of those he interviews, he is likely to employ this percentage with his group on a single day, and not over a few days. If he has reached his “quota” of 50% before the end of an interview day, he is likely to reject the subsequent candidates. The study checked the psychological influences that can cause a diversion in interviewers’ judgment, and claimed that people expect that a coincidental sample of people will bear randomized results and should not include a sequence. A sequence of strong candidates, therefore,  is not reasonable in their eyes and the final interviewee will suffer from the interviewer’s inclination to break the sequence.

Of course this information is not helpful for interviewees since they do not have the ability to schedule the time of their interview nor who else interviews that day. On the other hand, the study recommends that interviewers input their evaluations of candidates into a system that allows them to view the overall group of candidates for comparison.

The psychological diversion revealed by the study can also explain strange cases of candidates who were accepted to more selective programs but were rejected by less selective programs.



Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Congratulations to 2 Aringo clients who were accepted to Wharton Round 1 (out of 5 who applied)!

Aringo acceptance rate for Round 1 Wharton: 40%

Thursday, March 07, 2013

Congratulations!

Two additional Aringo clients were accepted to NYU (MBA).

Two additiona Aringo clients were invited to interview at MIT (MBA).
Another Aringo client was invited to interview at NYU (MBA).

Tuesday, March 05, 2013

Record Number of GMATs in 2012


New data published by GMAC point to a record 286,529 GMAT tests taken in 2012. This is the highest number ever recorded, reflecting an 11% increase from 2011, after a slight decrease in 2010-2011.

A big contribution to the increase is the number of test takers outside of the U.S., especially in Asia. Only 41% of the 2012 tests were completed by U.S. citizens, while the number of test takers outside the U.S. rose by 19% from 2011. The next largest percentage in 2012 went to Eastern and Southeastern Asia at 27% of total tests, in third place were Central and Southern Asia with 11.5%, and the fourth spot went to Western Europe with 6.6%. The Middle East took the fifth spot with 3.5%.

GMAC, the company responsible for the GMAT test explained that the 2012 data show that MBA studies are becoming increasingly global and varied, with a wider range of candidates from around the world sending their GMAT scores to programs in different parts of the world. In 2012, 831,337 score reports were submitted by candidates (an average of 2.9 reports for each test taker) to 5,281 programs. It is important to note that the data refers to the testing period ending 30.6.12. Part of the increase in number of test takers results from the attempt of many to rush to take the test and avoid the new IR section added mid-year.

Additional statistical data shows that among  2012 test takers, 57% were male and 43% female (this number is consistently rising and at an all-time high for the third year in a row). Test takers are becoming younger, with 47% below 25 and 38% between 25-30. In terms of their origin, China is second to the U.S. at 20% and India in third with 10.5%. In reference to which countries test takers sent their reports, the U.S. led at 75.8%, followed by the U.K. with 4.2%, and Canada with 4%.


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Monday, March 04, 2013

Crossing Fingers!

Another Aringo client was invited to interview at NYU (MBA).
Another Aringo client was invited to interview at IESE (MBA).
Two additional Aringo clients were invited to interview at MIT (MBA).

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Significant Improvement in MBAs' Search for Jobs and Internships


According to a Poets & Quants article, it seems that 2012 was a good year for MBA graduate recruitment. The article reports that the MBA Career Services Council, an association of business school career services offices and companies who recruit MBA graduates, reported that 45% of business schools showed an increase in on-campus recruitment activity in 2012. The job supply also increased with 58% of schools reporting an increase in the number of positions offered last year.

These findings reinforce earlier findings regarding an improvement in the job market for MBA graduates. The association’s survey including 76 MBA programs around the world, with more than half of them ranked in the world’s top 50. Among top-20 schools, 47% reported an increase in supply of full-time positions and among schools ranked 21-50, 40% reported a similar increase. These findings testify to the economic recovery and are an encouraging sign that graduates will easily re-enter the job market.

In addition to the encouraging data about full-time positions, a small improvement has been shown in recruitment for summer internships, mainly in the areas of consulting and technology. The schools themselves also assist students in finding work through different academic programs, relocation support, and training in career-search strategies.


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year)
Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)

Monday, February 18, 2013

Crossing Fingers!

Eight additional Aringo clients were invited to interview at Chicago (MBA).
Another Aringo client was invited to interview at NYU (MBA).

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Which MBA Programs Lead in Teamwork?


MBA applicants invest great effort in deciding which program fits them best. Aside from considering a program’s rank and areas of expertise, many also weigh the atmosphere at the school, nature of the program, and teaching style. Within its ranking of the top MBA program in 2012, Businessweek also included a survey of 2012 alumni about different aspects of MBA programs.

One of these aspects was teamwork, and the students were asked to rank their program’s approach to teamwork between 1-poor and 6-exceptional. The average grade for all the programs was 5.07, with the top spot going to Queen’s in Ontario, Canada.

At Queen’s, team-based learning is a main emphasis. At the start, the students are split into groups of 6 or 7 students, with whom they tackle all the required courses. Each group is assigned a conference room stocked with supplies and a professional coach for group support and feedback.

The second spot was occupied by ESADE in Spain where teamwork is also emphasized. There, the students are divided into new study groups each semester.
The rest of the ranking:

3- IMD
4- Kellogg
5- Tuck
6- Cornell
7- Duke
8- Michigan State
9- NYU
10- Tepper


Put Me in Business (applying in less than a year) Put Me in Business (applying in more than a year)